As the controversial idea of a pine marten reintroduction to southern England gathers momentum I thought I would post on some of the background science involved in PM conservation.
Although it is recovering well in Scotland and Ireland the jury is still out as to whether there is a viable population in England and Wales. Is there, as one of the wildlife charities involved claims, a remnant population of survivors that are poised to re-colonise the southern UK as soon as conditions permit, or, as other experts claim, perhaps a few escapees from wildlife collections and private keepers that show up from time to time that are too scattered to form a viable population. Regardless of this, it is probably not unreasonable to suggest that the pine marten will gradually spread south from Scotland and repopulate northern England. However it will take an awfully long time for them to reach southern England, if ever. If suitable habitat exists, why not reintroduce this species, once one of our most common predators, and now the UK’s second rarest (the wildcat has the dubious distinction of being the rarest) and is almost certainly extinct south of the Thames, sorry Severn, and probably a good deal further north?
But where would they come from? Recent DNA analysis of museum specimens has shown the original Welsh (and I think English but I could be mistaken) population was genetically quite different to animals currently living in Scotland. The Irish ones are different to both. It seems that the original Welsh (and English?) martens are more closely related to those of central Europe while the Scottish haplotype are closer to those found in Scandinavia. Why? Given that the pine marten was – and still is in North America - a valuable fur-bearing mammal; could there have been introductions in the dim and distant past? Perhaps Monty Python had the answer: Bloody Vikings! This is pure speculation on my part of course.
The DNA work is being done by Pete Turner and Catherine O’Reilly and their (very small) team at Waterford Institute of Technology. Using baited plastic tubes (originally trialled at Wildwood in Kent on captive martens) they collect small samples of hair for DNA analysis to study the interrelatedness and distribution of pine martens in Ireland. They are now also working on the identification of possible marten samples collected in England and Wales.

Camera trap image of a wild pine marten in southern Ireland.

Camera trap image of a wild pine marten in southern Ireland. I am trying to photograph non-habituated martens in their natural forest habitat, but despite long days spent in a hide in the middle of an Irish wood, I have yet to get photos other than by camera trap. They are not particularly nocturnal and have visited the cam trap in daylight but not if I am in the forest. I think they hide behind trees waiting for me to leave.
These images were taken with a Trailmaster IR monitor, Nikon D200 camera and multiple SB800 and SB25 speedlights.

Captured by a camera trap a wild Irish marten using the hair tube. A small piece of chicken is fastened inside the tube and a sticky patch traps a few hairs from the marten's neck.

Pete Turner collects the hair sample.

Jacinta Mullins of Waterford Institute of Technology extracts DNA from the hair sample. Jacinta explained the process in some detail but I won't bother to post it here. Besides, I didn't understand a word.
Hopefully, the pine marten roadshow extends to Scotland next year where I will be collaborating with local photographer James Moore:
http://jamesamoore.blogspot.com/ James already has some great PM photos and will bring in-depth knowledge of the local forests and wildlife to the team and I will bring, er...